THE SUPPLY CHAINS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Main Article Content

Javier Gómez Maturano, Sr.

Abstract

Climate change, depletion of natural resources, precarious working conditions, loss of social guarantees, are reasons to rethink the traditional production model based on "extract, make and discard". Consumer pressures, environmental and social norms and even the interests of companies, make supply chains seek the development of sustainable practices, incorporating environmental care and social responsibility among their objectives. In this context, the evaluation of supply chains becomes necessary as part of the diagnostics of the productive sector and how they are aligned with sustainability. The objective of this paper is to present a general overview of the research on the evaluation of sustainable performance in the field of supply chain management. More than a compendium of indicators and evaluation techniques, a theoretical and methodological discussion of the implications of including sustainable objectives to analyze and evaluate the sustainability of supply chains is presented. Based on a review of the literature in specialized databases, a framework of analysis of the proposals for the evaluation of sustainability is outlined. The review focuses on finding structural elements of the evaluation process published until 2016. As a result, sustainability approaches that trace the "should be" and allow contrasting and valuing are identified. Second, the performance dimensions: social, environmental and economic. It is found that the evaluation proposals can be in three axes of analysis. It is identified that methodological elements are necessary to guide the evaluation towards the identification of social and environmental deficiencies and risks, which entails a management of the supply chain with a strong sustainability focus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gómez Maturano, J. (2018). THE SUPPLY CHAINS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Revista Universitaria Ruta, 20(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.15443/RUTA20231089
Section
Artículos

References

Ahi, P., Jaber, M. Y., & Searcy, C. (2016). A comprehensive multidimensional framework for assessing the performance of sustainable supply chains. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(23–24), 10153–10166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.07.001

Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2011). A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.012

Baumgartner, R. J. (2011). Critical perspectives of sustainable development research and practice. Critical Perspectives of Sustainable Development Research and Practice Utrecht 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.005

Carrión Mena, F. (2016). El resto político del gobierno de la ciudad metropolitana. In L. Ávarez Enríquez, G. C. Delgado Ramos, & A. Leal Martínez (Eds.), Los desafíos de la ciudad del siglo XXI (1ra., pp. 25–41). Ciudad de México.

Chai, N. (2009). Sustainability Performance Evaluation System in Government. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3012-2

Chardine-Baumann, E., & Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2014). A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 76(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.029

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2008). Administración de la cadena de suministra. Estrategia, Planeación y operación (3rd ed.). México: Pearson, Prentice Hall.

Crainic, T. G., Ricciardi, N., & Storchi, G. (2009). Models for Evaluating and Planning City Logistics Systems. Transportation Science, 43(4), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0279

de Mattos, C. A. (2016). Financiarización, Lógica Mercantil y reconfiguración urbana: ¿Hacia una ciudad mercancia? In L. Ávarez Enríquez, G. C. Delgado Ramos, & A. Leal Martínez (Eds.), Los desafíos de la ciudad del siglo XXI (1ra., p. 526).

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – Management To Business Strategy, 284, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339

Fink, A. (1998). Conducting research literature reviews: from paper to the internet. (Sage). Thousand Oaks.

Gallopín, G. (2003). Sostenibilidad y desarrollo Sostenible: un enfoque sistémico. Serie Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591

GRI. (2015). Sustainability and Reporting Trends in 2025 – Preparing for the Future –, (May), 19. Retrieved from

https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Sustainability-and-ReportingTrends-in-2025-1.pdf

Grosvold, J., Stefan, U. H., & Jens, K. R. (2014). Squaring the circle. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 292–305.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0440

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., Baptista, P., Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (1991). Metodología de la investigación. https://doi.org/- ISBN 978-92-75-32913-9

Jeurissen, R. (2000). Book Reviews. Journal of Bussiness Ethics, 23, 231–234.

Jiménez, J. E., & Hernández, S. (2002). Marco conceptual de la cadena de suministro : un nuevo enfoque logístico. Instituto Mexicano Del Transporte, (215), 1–272.

Leal Medina, F. de J. S., Romo Rojas, L., & Pérez Méndez, B. I. (2017). Métodos de valuación de activos intangibles y métodos de evaluación para la sostenibilidad. Revisión teórica. In La cooperación y nuevos enfoques estratégicos ante la complejidad del entorno empresarial globalizado (pp. 633–649). Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco. Retrieved from http://acacia.org.mx/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/La cooperación y nuevos enfoques estratégicos FINAL pdf.pdf

Leff, E., Argueta, A., Boege, E., & Gonçalves, C. P. (2002). Más allá del desarrollo sostenible: la construcción de una racionalidad ambiental para la sustentabilidad: una visión desde América Latina. PISANTY, I, 479–578.

Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable Development " A Critical Review. World, 19(6), 607–621.

Luffiego García, M. (2000). La evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad y su introducción en la enseñanza. Historia y Epistemología de Las Ciencias, 18(3), 473–486. Retrieved from http://www.raco.cat/index.php/ensenanza/article/viewFile/21701/21535

Marshall, R. S., & Brown, D. (2003). The Strategy of Sustainability: A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE ON ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES. California Management Review, 46(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00083-1

Marying, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Research, 1(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7

Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007a). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1083–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013

Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007b). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1083–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013

Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 478–496.

https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258564

Mota, B., Gomes, M. I., Carvalho, A., & Barbosa-Povoa, A. P. (2015). Towards supply chain sustainability: Economic, environmental and social design and planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.052

Norman, W., & Macdonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035

Pastor Pérez, M. D. P., Ramos Ávila, A. E., & Santa María Torres, A. (2016). Evaluación de la sustentabilidad: una reflexión a partir del caso de la Red Nacional de Desarrollo Rural Sustentable (México). Entreciencias: Diálogos En La Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 4(9).

Rouse, M. (2012). Downcycling.

Sánchez Lara, B. (2016). Los desafíos de la logística urbana: una propuesta de planeación centrada en la mejora de la movilidad. In Congreso Internacional de Logística y Cadena de Suministro. Mérida, Yucatán. México.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2014). Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0061

Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

Speelman, E. N., Astier, M., & Galván-Miyoshi, Y. (2009). Sistematización y análisis de los estudios de caso MESMIS: lecciones para el futuro.

Tajbakhsh, A., & Hassini, E. (2015). A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.054

van Bommel, H. W. M. (2011). A conceptual framework for analyzing sustainability strategies in industrial supply networks from an innovation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.015

Varsei, M., Soosay, C., Fahimnia, B., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Framing sustainability performance of supply chains with multidimensional indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0436

Winter, M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2013). Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031311293237