La resolución anafórica y la estructura discursiva en la población infantil: la relevancia del tipo de referente (humano/animal/cosa) y del tipo de relación retórica (coordinada/subordinada
Resumen
Este trabajo tiene como objetivo demostrar que las características sintáctico-semánticas del antecedente y el tipo de relación retórica en la que aparecen el antecedente y el elemento fóricо son factores relevantes para la resolución anafórica realizada por la población infantil. Para comprobar esta hipótesis, se leyeron a sujetos de aproximadamente nueve años diferentes microtextos con dos posibles competidores con propiedades idénticas, con el fin de determinar cuál era el antecedente en un enunciado objetivo. Se realizó un ANOVA de medidas repetidas para determinar diferencias significativas. Los resultados indican, por un lado, que los elementos fóricos con antecedentes animados se resuelven mejor que aquellos con antecedentes de cosa. Además, dentro de los antecedentes animados, los sintagmas nominales de animal se recuerdan mejor que los antroponímicos. Por otro lado, los elementos fóricos situados en relaciones retóricas de subordinación se resuelven mejor que en aquellos casos en los que el antecedente y el elemento fóricо aparecen en relaciones retóricas de coordinación. Finalmente, si ambos factores se tienen en cuenta simultáneamente, se obtienen resultados interesantes.
Citas
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573
Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology 44–45, 68 – 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .cedpsych.2016.02.002
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: the informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748– 65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.748
Arnold, J. E. (2010). How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(4), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00193.x
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children’s use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 527–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600845950
Asher, N. (1998). Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation. First Workshop on Non-narrative Text Structure. Elsevier, 1-28. http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/philosophy/faculty/asher/.../DSLC.ps.
Asher, N. (2000). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. En J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi & A. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 123-150). Oxford University Press.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2008). Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure. En Bunt, H. y Muskens, R. (eds.), Computing Meaning (pp. 87-124). Springer.
Bahr, C., & Hernández Arocha, H. (2018). ¿Tienen significado los nombres propios? Una aproximación al debate inconcluso en torno a la semántica y (difusa) categorización de nombres propios y comunes. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 134(2), 329-348.
Ballesteros, S. (1999). Memoria humana: investigación y teoría. Psicothema, 11(4), 705-723.
Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships, Linguistics, 24(1), 227-284. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.227
Beaugrande, R.-A. & Dressler, W. U. (1972). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Max Niemeyer.
Bel, A. (2001). Sujetos nulos y sujetos explícitos en las gramáticas iniciales del castellano y el catalán. Revista Española de Lingüística, 31(2), 537-562. http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/1698
Belinchón, M., Igoa, J. M. & Rivière, Á. (1992). Psicología del lenguaje. Investigación y teoría. Trotta.
Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard.
Bernárdez, E. (1982). Introducción a la lingüística del texto. Espasa-Calpe.
Bittner, D. (2007). Influence of animacy and grammatical role on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns in German L1-acquisition. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 103-138.
Bower, G. H, & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension. Science, 247, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2403694
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Gustav Fischer.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489 –503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Carlson, L. & Marcu, D. (2001). Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. ISI Technical Report, ISI-TR-545. University of Southern California. https://www.isi.edu/~marcu/discourse/tagging-ref-manual.pdf
Cohen, G. (l990). Why is it difficult to put names to faces? British Journal of Psychology, 81.287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02362.x
Comrie, B. (1979). Definite and Animate Direct Objects: A Natural Class, Lingüística silesiana 3, 13–21.
Comrie, B. (1980). Agreement, Animacy, and Voice, en G. Brettschneider and C. Lehmann (eds.), Wege Zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum (pp. 229–234). Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, Gunter Narr.
Cowles, H. W., Walenski, M., & Kluender, R. (2007). Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: topic, contrastive focus and pronouns. Topoi 26. 3– 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-9004-6
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.99.2.311
Dik, S. C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the clause. De Gruyter Mouton.
Duque, E. (2014). La construcción del discurso en la comunicación política: Análisis lingüístico de los discursos de Esperanza Aguirre (tesis doctoral). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Duque, E. (2016). Las relaciones del discurso. Arco-Libros.
Duque, E. (2022). Gramática y Estudios del discurso. En López Ferrero, C., Carranza, I. E., y van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Estudios del discurso: The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Discourse Studies (pp. 143-156). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological review, 102(2), 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Evans, R. & Orasan, C. (2000). Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. En Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000), pp. 154-162. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c0dcd92c0bff5474a298710bdc9310ed4c20c41c
Fernández Leborans, M. J. (1999). El nombre propio. En Bosque, I. y Demonte, V. (ed.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. 77-128.
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language 56, 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.004
Gárate, M., Gutiérrez, F., Luque.Vilaseca, J. L., García-Madruga, J. A., & Elosúa de Juan, M. R. (1999). Inferencias y comprensión lectora, en García Madruga, J. A. (coord..). Comprensión lectora y memoria operativa : aspectos evolutivos e instruccionales (pp. 33-54). Paidós.
Garrido Medina, J. (2003). Relevance versus connection: Discourse and text as units of analysis. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, 13, 13-22. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/download/88431/4564456564109
Garrido Medina, J. (2007a). Construcción de discurso en noticias de prensa. Revista Española de Lingüística, 37, pp. 139-168.
Garrido Medina, J. (2007b). Relaciones de discurso. Pandora: revue d'etudes hispaniques, 7, pp. 305-332.
Garrido, J. (2017). Segmentación del discurso e interacción. Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 71, 35-62.
Garrido, J., & Rodríguez Ramalle, T. (2015). Constituyentes y relaciones en la oración y en el discurso. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 62, 200-25.
Garrod, S. & Sanford, A. (1994) Resolving sentences in a discourse context. How discourse representation affect language understanding. En M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.) Psycholinguistics. San Diego, Academic Press. 675-698.
Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(74)90010-9
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the disadvantage of later mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90063-5
González Álvarez, J., Cervera Crespo, T. & Miralles Adell, J.L. (1998). La adquisición de las relaciones anafóricas en castellano: clases de anáforas y efecto de la distancia. Infancia y Aprendizaje 82, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037098320784844
González Vergara, C. (2006). La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: una aproximación al modelo, Onomázein 14 (2): 101-140. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.14.03
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. En Proceedings of ACL-83. https://aclanthology.org/P83-1007/
Halliday, M. & Ruqaiya H. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive science, 3(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
Hollis, J., & Valentine, T. (2001). Proper-name processing: Are proper names pure referencing expressions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.99
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. (1981). Role of some aspects of discourse structure–centering. En Proceedings of the IJCAI, https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/81-1/Papers/071.pdf.
Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm018
Kehler, A. & Rohde, H. (2019). Prominence and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 154, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.006
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61551-4
Kintsch, W. (2018). Revisiting the construction—integration model of text comprehension and its Implications for Instruction. En Alvervamann, D.E., Unrau, N.J. y Ruddell, R., Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 805-839). Routledge.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85(5), 363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Kolhatkar, V., Roussel, A., Dipper, S., & Zinsmeister, H. (2018). Anaphora with non-nominal antecedents in computational linguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 44(3), 547-612. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00327
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Loaiciga Sanchez, S. (2017). Pronominal anaphora and verbal tenses in machine translation (Tesis Doctoral). University of Geneva.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University press.
Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. A. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: a framework for the analysis of texts, Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 79-105.
Mann, W. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text, 8 (3), pp.243-281.
Martins, I. P., & Farrajota, L. (2007). Proper and common names: A double dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1744-1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.016
Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M. (1996). What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one's own name. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 8(1), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199612200-00045
Oakhill, J. V., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106 –115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00012.x
Ojea, A. (2001). El desarrollo sintáctico en la adquisición de la primera lengua: análisis de la etapa telegráfica de un sujeto monolingüe. Revista española de lingüística, 31(2), 413-430. http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/1694
Pitarque, A., & Algarabel González, S. (1991). El conexionismo como marco de simulación: Aplicación a una tarea de facilitación semántica. Cognitiva, 3(2), 165-186.
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2007). Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse TreeBank, Traitement Automatique des Langues, Special Issue on Computational Approaches to Document and Discourse, 47(2), 1-8. https://www.atala.org/index.php/content/tal_47_2_2
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A. & Webber, B. (2008). The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), https://aclanthology.org/L08-1093/
Prasad, R., Joshi, A. & Webber, B. (2010). Realization of Discourse Relations by Other Means: Alternative Lexicalizations, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Pekín, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1944566.1944684
Prat-Sala, M. & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42(2), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2668.
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2006) Minimalist Syntax Revisited, http://courses.essex.ac.uk/lg/lg514
Rastier, F. (1993). Complejidad semántica y contexto. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística, N. 9 (1993); pp. 25-42.
Rapp, D. N., & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.988
Rebollo Torío, M. Á. (1995). El nombre propio y su significado. Anuario de estudios filológicos, 18, 399-406.
Renkema, J. (2009). The texture of discourse: Towards an outline of connectivity theory. John Benjamins.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. En L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281-337), Kluwer.
Rizzi, L. (2013). Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus, 25 (1), 197-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0010
Rohde, H., & Kehler, A. (2014). Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(8), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.854918
Rose, R. (2007). Pronoun resolution and the influence of syntactic and semantic information on discourse prominence. En Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications: 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, DAARC 2007, Lagos, Portugal, March 29-30, 2007. Selected Papers 6 (pp. 28-43). Springer.
Sanders, T. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic source of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24, pp. 119-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545009
Sanders, T., Spooren, W. & Noordman, L. (1992). Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15, pp. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544800
Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J. & Spooren, W. (eds.) (2001). Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic aspects. John Benjamins.
Schumacher, P. B., Dangl, M., & Uzun, E. (2016). Thematic role as prominence cue during pronoun resolution in German. En A. Holler y K. Suckow (eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution (pp. 121–147). Berlín y Boston: de Gruyter.
Schumacher, P. B., Roberts, L., & Järvikivi, J. (2017). Agentivity drives real-time pronoun resolution: Evidence from German er and der. Lingua, 185, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.07.004
Serra, M. (2013). Comunicación y lenguaje. La nueva neuropsicología cognitiva II. Barcelona. Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Serra, M., Serrat, E., Solé, R., Bel, A. & Aparici, M. (2000). La adquisición del lenguaje. Ariel.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity, En R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages (pp. 112-171), Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Silverstein, M. (1981). Case Marking and the Nature of Language, Australian Journal of Linguistics 1, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608108599275
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402130
Stevenson, R., Knott, A., Oberlander, J., & McDonald, S. (2000). Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(3), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386048
Sulpizio, S., & Job, R. (2018). Early and multiple-loci divergency of proper and common names: An event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychologia, 119, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034
Taboada, M. & Mann, W. C. (2006). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead. Discourse Studies, 8 (3), pp. 423-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061881
Tomaszewicz-Özakın, B., & Schumacher, P. B. (2022). Anaphoric pronouns and the computation of prominence profiles. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09873-9
Tordera Yllescas, J. C. (2019). Las relaciones de interdependencia y la anáfora de sentido. En Ferran Robles y Sabater y Pau Bertomeu-Pi (ed.), La construcción del discurso en español y catalán/La construcció del discurs en espanyol i català. Berlín: Buske,131-141.
Tordera Yllescas, J. C. (2021). La evolución de las relaciones retóricas y de la anáfora en niños hispanohablantes. Lengua y Habla, (25), 268-294. http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/issue/view/1600/showToc
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics. An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford. Blackwell.
Valentine, T., Moore, V., Flude, B. M., Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. (1993). Repetition priming and proper name processing. Do common nouns and proper names prime each other? En G. Cohen, y D. M. Burke (Eds.), Memory for proper names (pp. 329-349, Chapter iv, 240 Pages). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic press. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.5491&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Van Valin, R. D. Jr. & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, C. H., & Yekovich, F. R. (1987). Activation and use of script-based antecedents in anaphoric reference. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90109-4
Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K., & Prince, E. F. (1998). Centering in naturally occurring discourse: An overview. En M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi y E. F. Prince (ed.), Centering theory in discourse (pp. 1-30), Clarendon Press Oxford.
Webber, B., Stone, M., Joshi, A., & Knott, A. (2003). Anaphora and Discourse Structure, Computational Linguistics, 29 (4), 545–587. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120103322753347
Wigglesworth, G. (1990). Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First language 10(29), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002902.
Wolf, F., Gibson, E. & Desmet, T. (2004). Discourse coherence and pronoun interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000034
Wolf, F. & Gibson, E. (2006). Coherence in natural language: Data Structures and Applications. MIT Press.
Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and reference: a cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology 44–45, 68 – 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .cedpsych.2016.02.002
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: the informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748– 65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.748
Arnold, J. E. (2010). How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(4), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00193.x
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children’s use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 527–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600845950
Asher, N. (1998). Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation. First Workshop on Non-narrative Text Structure. Elsevier, 1-28. http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/philosophy/faculty/asher/.../DSLC.ps.
Asher, N. (2000). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. En J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi & A. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 123-150). Oxford University Press.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2008). Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure. En Bunt, H. y Muskens, R. (eds.), Computing Meaning (pp. 87-124). Springer.
Bahr, C., & Hernández Arocha, H. (2018). ¿Tienen significado los nombres propios? Una aproximación al debate inconcluso en torno a la semántica y (difusa) categorización de nombres propios y comunes. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 134(2), 329-348.
Ballesteros, S. (1999). Memoria humana: investigación y teoría. Psicothema, 11(4), 705-723.
Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships, Linguistics, 24(1), 227-284. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.227
Beaugrande, R.-A. & Dressler, W. U. (1972). Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Max Niemeyer.
Bel, A. (2001). Sujetos nulos y sujetos explícitos en las gramáticas iniciales del castellano y el catalán. Revista Española de Lingüística, 31(2), 537-562. http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/1698
Belinchón, M., Igoa, J. M. & Rivière, Á. (1992). Psicología del lenguaje. Investigación y teoría. Trotta.
Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard.
Bernárdez, E. (1982). Introducción a la lingüística del texto. Espasa-Calpe.
Bittner, D. (2007). Influence of animacy and grammatical role on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns in German L1-acquisition. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 103-138.
Bower, G. H, & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension. Science, 247, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2403694
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Gustav Fischer.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489 –503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Carlson, L. & Marcu, D. (2001). Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. ISI Technical Report, ISI-TR-545. University of Southern California. https://www.isi.edu/~marcu/discourse/tagging-ref-manual.pdf
Cohen, G. (l990). Why is it difficult to put names to faces? British Journal of Psychology, 81.287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02362.x
Comrie, B. (1979). Definite and Animate Direct Objects: A Natural Class, Lingüística silesiana 3, 13–21.
Comrie, B. (1980). Agreement, Animacy, and Voice, en G. Brettschneider and C. Lehmann (eds.), Wege Zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum (pp. 229–234). Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, Gunter Narr.
Cowles, H. W., Walenski, M., & Kluender, R. (2007). Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: topic, contrastive focus and pronouns. Topoi 26. 3– 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-9004-6
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.99.2.311
Dik, S. C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the clause. De Gruyter Mouton.
Duque, E. (2014). La construcción del discurso en la comunicación política: Análisis lingüístico de los discursos de Esperanza Aguirre (tesis doctoral). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Duque, E. (2016). Las relaciones del discurso. Arco-Libros.
Duque, E. (2022). Gramática y Estudios del discurso. En López Ferrero, C., Carranza, I. E., y van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Estudios del discurso: The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Discourse Studies (pp. 143-156). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological review, 102(2), 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Evans, R. & Orasan, C. (2000). Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. En Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000), pp. 154-162. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=c0dcd92c0bff5474a298710bdc9310ed4c20c41c
Fernández Leborans, M. J. (1999). El nombre propio. En Bosque, I. y Demonte, V. (ed.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. 77-128.
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language 56, 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.004
Gárate, M., Gutiérrez, F., Luque.Vilaseca, J. L., García-Madruga, J. A., & Elosúa de Juan, M. R. (1999). Inferencias y comprensión lectora, en García Madruga, J. A. (coord..). Comprensión lectora y memoria operativa : aspectos evolutivos e instruccionales (pp. 33-54). Paidós.
Garrido Medina, J. (2003). Relevance versus connection: Discourse and text as units of analysis. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, 13, 13-22. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CLAC/article/download/88431/4564456564109
Garrido Medina, J. (2007a). Construcción de discurso en noticias de prensa. Revista Española de Lingüística, 37, pp. 139-168.
Garrido Medina, J. (2007b). Relaciones de discurso. Pandora: revue d'etudes hispaniques, 7, pp. 305-332.
Garrido, J. (2017). Segmentación del discurso e interacción. Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 71, 35-62.
Garrido, J., & Rodríguez Ramalle, T. (2015). Constituyentes y relaciones en la oración y en el discurso. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 62, 200-25.
Garrod, S. & Sanford, A. (1994) Resolving sentences in a discourse context. How discourse representation affect language understanding. En M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.) Psycholinguistics. San Diego, Academic Press. 675-698.
Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(74)90010-9
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the disadvantage of later mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90006-5
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90063-5
González Álvarez, J., Cervera Crespo, T. & Miralles Adell, J.L. (1998). La adquisición de las relaciones anafóricas en castellano: clases de anáforas y efecto de la distancia. Infancia y Aprendizaje 82, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037098320784844
González Vergara, C. (2006). La Gramática del Papel y la Referencia: una aproximación al modelo, Onomázein 14 (2): 101-140. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.14.03
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. (1983). Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. En Proceedings of ACL-83. https://aclanthology.org/P83-1007/
Halliday, M. & Ruqaiya H. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive science, 3(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
Hollis, J., & Valentine, T. (2001). Proper-name processing: Are proper names pure referencing expressions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.99
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. (1981). Role of some aspects of discourse structure–centering. En Proceedings of the IJCAI, https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/81-1/Papers/071.pdf.
Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 25(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm018
Kehler, A. & Rohde, H. (2019). Prominence and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 154, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.006
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61551-4
Kintsch, W. (2018). Revisiting the construction—integration model of text comprehension and its Implications for Instruction. En Alvervamann, D.E., Unrau, N.J. y Ruddell, R., Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 805-839). Routledge.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85(5), 363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Kolhatkar, V., Roussel, A., Dipper, S., & Zinsmeister, H. (2018). Anaphora with non-nominal antecedents in computational linguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 44(3), 547-612. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00327
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Loaiciga Sanchez, S. (2017). Pronominal anaphora and verbal tenses in machine translation (Tesis Doctoral). University of Geneva.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University press.
Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. A. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: a framework for the analysis of texts, Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 79-105.
Mann, W. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text, 8 (3), pp.243-281.
Martins, I. P., & Farrajota, L. (2007). Proper and common names: A double dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1744-1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.016
Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M. (1996). What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one's own name. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 8(1), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199612200-00045
Oakhill, J. V., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106 –115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00012.x
Ojea, A. (2001). El desarrollo sintáctico en la adquisición de la primera lengua: análisis de la etapa telegráfica de un sujeto monolingüe. Revista española de lingüística, 31(2), 413-430. http://revista.sel.edu.es/index.php/revista/article/view/1694
Pitarque, A., & Algarabel González, S. (1991). El conexionismo como marco de simulación: Aplicación a una tarea de facilitación semántica. Cognitiva, 3(2), 165-186.
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2007). Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse TreeBank, Traitement Automatique des Langues, Special Issue on Computational Approaches to Document and Discourse, 47(2), 1-8. https://www.atala.org/index.php/content/tal_47_2_2
Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Miltsakaki, E., Robaldo, L., Joshi, A. & Webber, B. (2008). The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), https://aclanthology.org/L08-1093/
Prasad, R., Joshi, A. & Webber, B. (2010). Realization of Discourse Relations by Other Means: Alternative Lexicalizations, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Pekín, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1944566.1944684
Prat-Sala, M. & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42(2), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2668.
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2006) Minimalist Syntax Revisited, http://courses.essex.ac.uk/lg/lg514
Rastier, F. (1993). Complejidad semántica y contexto. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística, N. 9 (1993); pp. 25-42.
Rapp, D. N., & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.988
Rebollo Torío, M. Á. (1995). El nombre propio y su significado. Anuario de estudios filológicos, 18, 399-406.
Renkema, J. (2009). The texture of discourse: Towards an outline of connectivity theory. John Benjamins.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. En L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281-337), Kluwer.
Rizzi, L. (2013). Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus, 25 (1), 197-226. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0010
Rohde, H., & Kehler, A. (2014). Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(8), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.854918
Rose, R. (2007). Pronoun resolution and the influence of syntactic and semantic information on discourse prominence. En Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications: 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, DAARC 2007, Lagos, Portugal, March 29-30, 2007. Selected Papers 6 (pp. 28-43). Springer.
Sanders, T. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic source of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24, pp. 119-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545009
Sanders, T., Spooren, W. & Noordman, L. (1992). Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15, pp. 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544800
Sanders, T., Schilperoord, J. & Spooren, W. (eds.) (2001). Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic aspects. John Benjamins.
Schumacher, P. B., Dangl, M., & Uzun, E. (2016). Thematic role as prominence cue during pronoun resolution in German. En A. Holler y K. Suckow (eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution (pp. 121–147). Berlín y Boston: de Gruyter.
Schumacher, P. B., Roberts, L., & Järvikivi, J. (2017). Agentivity drives real-time pronoun resolution: Evidence from German er and der. Lingua, 185, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.07.004
Serra, M. (2013). Comunicación y lenguaje. La nueva neuropsicología cognitiva II. Barcelona. Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Serra, M., Serrat, E., Solé, R., Bel, A. & Aparici, M. (2000). La adquisición del lenguaje. Ariel.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity, En R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages (pp. 112-171), Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Silverstein, M. (1981). Case Marking and the Nature of Language, Australian Journal of Linguistics 1, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608108599275
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402130
Stevenson, R., Knott, A., Oberlander, J., & McDonald, S. (2000). Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(3), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386048
Sulpizio, S., & Job, R. (2018). Early and multiple-loci divergency of proper and common names: An event-related potential investigation. Neuropsychologia, 119, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.034
Taboada, M. & Mann, W. C. (2006). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead. Discourse Studies, 8 (3), pp. 423-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061881
Tomaszewicz-Özakın, B., & Schumacher, P. B. (2022). Anaphoric pronouns and the computation of prominence profiles. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09873-9
Tordera Yllescas, J. C. (2019). Las relaciones de interdependencia y la anáfora de sentido. En Ferran Robles y Sabater y Pau Bertomeu-Pi (ed.), La construcción del discurso en español y catalán/La construcció del discurs en espanyol i català. Berlín: Buske,131-141.
Tordera Yllescas, J. C. (2021). La evolución de las relaciones retóricas y de la anáfora en niños hispanohablantes. Lengua y Habla, (25), 268-294. http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/issue/view/1600/showToc
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics. An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford. Blackwell.
Valentine, T., Moore, V., Flude, B. M., Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. (1993). Repetition priming and proper name processing. Do common nouns and proper names prime each other? En G. Cohen, y D. M. Burke (Eds.), Memory for proper names (pp. 329-349, Chapter iv, 240 Pages). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic press. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.5491&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Van Valin, R. D. Jr. & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, C. H., & Yekovich, F. R. (1987). Activation and use of script-based antecedents in anaphoric reference. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90109-4
Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K., & Prince, E. F. (1998). Centering in naturally occurring discourse: An overview. En M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi y E. F. Prince (ed.), Centering theory in discourse (pp. 1-30), Clarendon Press Oxford.
Webber, B., Stone, M., Joshi, A., & Knott, A. (2003). Anaphora and Discourse Structure, Computational Linguistics, 29 (4), 545–587. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120103322753347
Wigglesworth, G. (1990). Children’s narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First language 10(29), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002902.
Wolf, F., Gibson, E. & Desmet, T. (2004). Discourse coherence and pronoun interpretation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19:665–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000034
Wolf, F. & Gibson, E. (2006). Coherence in natural language: Data Structures and Applications. MIT Press.
Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and reference: a cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Autores/as
Tordera Yllescas, J. C. . (2026). La resolución anafórica y la estructura discursiva en la población infantil: la relevancia del tipo de referente (humano/animal/cosa) y del tipo de relación retórica (coordinada/subordinada. Logos: Revista De Lingüística, Filosofía Y Literatura, 36(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.15443/RL3617
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
