EDUCACIÓN EMPRENDEDORA EN CHILE: EXPLORANDO LA TEORÍA DEL PENSAMIENTO EFECTUAL EN ESTUDIANTES DE LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR, PERÍODO 2019-2021
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La Teoría de la Efectuación es una idea con un sentido de propósito: un deseo de mejorar el estado de la vida de las personas. El razonamiento efectivo es un tipo de resolución de problemas desarrollado a partir de un estudio basado en la ciencia cognitiva que toma el futuro como fundamentalmente impredecible, pero controlable a través de la acción humana; el medio ambiente construible a través de la elección, con una meta que privilegia el compromiso de las partes interesadas en lugar de métodos. preexistentes. La investigación sobre la Teoría Efectual ha encontrado que existe una ciencia para el emprendimiento y que puede profundizarse mediante la Educación en Emprendimiento.
Este estudio analiza la intención emprendedora para la toma de decisiones en estudiantes de Pregrado en Chile, contrastando el enfoque de pensamiento Efectual y Causal en el período 2019-2021. La metodología utilizada aborda un estudio cuantitativo empírico a través de cuestionarios de encuestas.
La investigación, por tanto, abordará los procesos de Educación en Emprendimiento en Estudiantes, según el modelo de efectual y causal. Para ello, se utilizan 25 ítems de escala de medición, en base a encuesta desarrollada por Krebbers (2015) y respaldado por Chandler, et al. (2011) y Munster (2016). Cada ítem de escala de medición se analiza y segmenta según lo referido al pensamiento causal y efectual, desarrollando un set de hipótesis para desarrollar el estudio metodológico.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
Chandler, G., DeTienne, D., Mckelvie, A., & Mumford, T. (2009), Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of business venturing
Comisión Europea (2016b). Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Recuperado de https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/images/4/45/195EN.pdf
Dew N., Read S., Sarasvathy S., Wiltbankd R., and (2009) Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices
Fayolle A., (2007). Entrepreneurship and New Value Creation. The Dynamics of the Entrepreneurial Process. Cambridge University Press.
Fayolle A., O Toutain O., (2011) El creador de empresa: ¿“un manipulador primitivo”? Desarrollo, Innovación y Cultura.
Fombrun, C. J., & Wally, S. (1989). Structuring small firms for rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 107-122.
Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American sociological review, 16(1), 14-21.
Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. Advanced methods of marketing
research, 407(3), 52-78.
Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research policy, 32(1), 157-178.
Franke, N., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software. Research policy, 32(7), 1199-1215.
Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management journal, 27(2), 399-423.
Freel, M. S. (2000). Do small innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Small Business Economics, 14(3), 195-210.
Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics.
Gartner W.B., (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question”. American Journal of Small Business. Spring. Páginas 11-32.
Gertie M. (2017) The use of effectuation logic in entrepreneurial teams' behavior and its effect in new ventures' performance Universidad de Cantabria
Gutiérrez Zepeda P., "Exploring Relationships Between Entrepreneurship Education and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Mixed Method Study of Entrepreneurial Pedagogies at Chilean Universities" (2015). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2633.
Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. (2000). Social identity, self‐categorization, and work motivation: rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 319-339.
Hellström, T., Hellström, C., & Berglund, H. (2002). The innovating self: exploring self among a group of technological innovators. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(4), 267-286.
Hemingway, C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of business ethics, 60(3), 233-249.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Henning, V., Sattler, H., Eggers, F. y Houston, M.B. (2007). The Last Picture Show? Timing and Order of Movie Distribution Channels. Journal of Marketing. 71, 63-83.
Henseler, J., Christain, M., Ringle, R. y Sinkovics (2009). The use of Partial Least Square Path modeling in international Marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.
Henry, C., Hill, F. y Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part 1. Education and Training, 47(2), 98-111.
Hindle, K. (2007). Teaching entrepreneurship at university: from the wrong building to the right philosophy. En Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, Volume 1.
Honnig B., (2004). “Entrepreneuship education: Toward a model of Contingency-Based Planning”. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2004, Vol. 3, Páginas 258-273.
Karlsson T., Honig B. (2009). “Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan”. Journal of Business Venturing. 24(1), Páginas 27-45.
Krebbers L., (2015) The first steps towards a quantitative measurement scale of Causation and Effectuation in a non-entrepreneurial student context University of Twente
Kuratko, D. (2003). Entrepreneurship education: emerging trends and challenges for the 21st century. Coleman Foundation White Paper Series for the U.S. Association of Small Business & Entrepreneurship.
Lange J., Mollow A., Pearlmutter M., Singh S., Bygrave W., (2006). Pre-start-up formal business plans and post-start-up performance: a study of 116 new ventures. Wellesley: Babson college.
Lemoigne J.L. (2001). Le constructivisme, Tomo 1: Les enracinements. L’Harmattan. Paris.
Lemoigne J.L. (2002). Le constructivisme, Tome 2: Epistémologie de l’interdisciplinarité. L’Harmattan, Paris.
Lemoigne J.L. (2003). Le constructivisme, Tomo 3: Modéliser pour comprendre. L’Harmattan, Paris
Morin E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Editions du Seuil. París. Exploring the resource logic of student entrepreneurs
Neck H.M., Greene P.P., Brush C.G., (2014) Teaching Entrepreneurship: A Practice-Based Approach
Pfeffer L., Khan M.S., Causation and Effectuation: An Exploratory Study of New Zealand Entrepreneurs, School of Management, Victoria Business School, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Politis D., Winborg J., Dahlstrand A.L., (2011). Exploring the resource logic of student entrepreneurs
Sarasvathy, S. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Allan Publishing Limited, Chentelham, UK.
Sarasvathy, S., (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Managment review 26 (2), 243-263.
Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N (2011). Without judgment: An empiracally-based entrepreneurial theory on the firm. The review of Austrian Economics.December.
Timmons, J.A., Spinelly, S., (2004). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21 st Century. McGraw Hill/Irwin New York, NY.