Literary Film Adaptation for Screen Production: the Analysis of Style Adaptation in the Film Naked Lunch from a Quantitative and Descriptive Perspective

Alejandro Torres Vergara


The study of film adaptations, particularly those coming from literature, has been growing at a rapid rate during the last years due to the amount of adaptations coming from both mainstream and independent film industries. The focus of these studies though is generally addressed to best sellers where the literary style is clearly adaptable to the screen; however, there are cases where the adaptive process has resulted in an entirely different outcome. Naked Lunch, written by William Burroughs and adapted to screen by David Cronenberg, represents a bold change if compared with other novels turned into films. The purpose of this article is to descriptively analyse the literary style in order to understand how it has been represented and adapted into Cronenberg’s film. The analysis will be performed helped with computer-based tools to support statements, using the novel itself as corpus and adding theoretical ideas from Leech and Short’s perspectives. The results suggest that the author’s corrosive, sexually-fuelled claustrophobic style has been translated following three patterns in terms of adaptation theory, although Burroughs, in the hands of Cronenberg, becomes an almost new classification of adaptation, not only adding literary features to the film, but also distinguishable core moments of the writer’s life to the final product. The analysis conducted encourages the study of other uncommon adaptations from literary authors in order to understand the adaptive process followed by filmmakers.


Andrew, D. (2009). From Concepts in Film Theory: Adaptation. In: L. Braudy and M. Cohen (eds.) Film Theory and Criticism, Seventh Edition (pp. 372-380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beard, W. (1996). Insert Poetics: Cronenberg’s Naked Lunch. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 23 (3), 823-852.

Biber, D. (2011). Corpus Linguistics and the study of Literature: Back to the Future?. Scientific Study of Literature 1 (1), 15-23. DOI: 10.1075/ssol.1.1.02bib

Burroughs, W. (1959). Naked Lunch. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishing.

Carter, R. & Simpson, P. (1995). Language, Discourse and Literature – An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics. London: Routledge Publishing.

Cattrysse, P. (1996). Descriptive and Normative Norms in Film Adaptation: The Hays Office and the American. Cinémas: Journal of Film Studies 6 (2-3), 167-188. DOI: 10.7202/1000978ar

Corrigan, T. (2001). The Essay Film - From Montaigne, After Marker. New York: Oxford University Press.

Creed, B. (2000). The Naked Crunch: Cronenberg’s homoerotic bodies. In: M. Grant (ed.) The Films of David Cronenberg (pp. 84-101). Wilthshire: Flicks Books.

Cronenberg, D. (1992). Naked Lunch [DVD]. Los Angeles: Criterion Collection.

Hantke, S. (2007). Genre and Authorship in David Cronenberg’s Naked Lunch. In: B. R. Palmer (ed.) Twentieth-Century American Fiction on Screen (pp. 170-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. & Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction – A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Loranger, C. (1999). This Book Spill off the Page in All Directions: What Is the Text of Naked Lunch?. Postmodern Culture 10 (1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1353/pmc.1999.0033

Lydenberg, R. (1987). World Cultures: Radical Theory and Practice in William S. Burroughs’ Fiction. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Moss, L. (2014). Corpus Stylistics and Henry James’ Syntax (Doctoral Thesis). University College London, London, UK.

Osgood, C., (1960). Some effects of motivation on style of encoding. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language (pp. 293-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rodley, C. (1992). Naked Making Lunch [DVD]. Los Angeles: Criterion Collection.


Alejandro Torres Vergara ( Contacto principal )
Torres Vergara, A. (2015). Literary Film Adaptation for Screen Production: the Analysis of Style Adaptation in the Film Naked Lunch from a Quantitative and Descriptive Perspective. Logos: Revista De Lingüística, Filosofía Y Literatura, 25(2), 154–164.
Copyright and license info is not available

Detalles del artículo