Assessment Protocol

Logos: Journal of Linguistics, Philosophy and Literature

Assessment Protocol

Article Code:

Title:

Author:

Instructions for the evaluator:

Dear evaluator,

The following assessment protocol aims to collect information regarding the quality of the enclosed article.

In order to accomplish this purpose, please mark with an “x” the most appropriate value according to your criteria, followed by a comment that justifies the assessment as appropriate.

 

1.-  The title clearly reflects the content of the article

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

2.- The abstract includes goals, methodology and results.

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

 

3.- The introduction provides  necessary background to understand the research problem

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations :

 

 

 

4.- The methodology is detailed (determines sample or corpus, uses statistical analysis procedures, etc.)

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

5.- The results are clear and consistent with the purpose or research question.

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.-  The results are properly interpreted

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

7.-  The references are relevant and updated.

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

 

 

8.-  The article is an original contribution to the discipline.

Excellent

Good

Adequate

Poor

Insufficient

 

 

 

 

 

Observations:

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation of the article

Considering the evaluation so far, you think the article should be:

 

Accepted without changes

 

Accepted with minor amendments (a new version not required)

 

Accepted with major amendments (requires a new version)

 

Only accepted after corrections

 

Rejected

 

 

The evaluator declares that this assessment is not affected by any conflict of interest, whether in relation to the investigative work or as to the connections that the evaluator may have with the author of the text.

 

 

 

Comments

Provide comments that guide the author and support your recommendation

1.- Comments to the editor (confidential):

 

2.- Comments to the author:



Universidad de la Serena. Departamento de Artes y Letras. Facultad de Humanidades. Avenida Raúl Bitrán 1305. Campus Andrés Bello. Colina el Pino. La Serena. CHILE.